IB论文（EE）辅导课程

It is an independent piece of research, culminating with a 4,000-word paper.

IB论文（EE）的测试形式通常是以论文写作为主。但各个等级不同。如下：

Grade A

Demonstrates: effective research skills resulting in a well-focused and appropriate research question that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic; effective engagement with relevant research areas, methods and sources; excellent knowledge and understanding of  the topic in  the wider context   of the relevant discipline; the effective application of source material and correct use of subject-specific terminology and/or concepts further supporting this; consistent and relevant conclusions that are proficiently analysed; sustained reasoned argumentation supported effectively by evidence; critically evaluated research; excellent presentation of the essay, whereby coherence and consistency further support the reading of the essay; present and correctly applied structural and layout elements. Engagement with the process is conceptual and personal, key decision-making during the research process    is documented, and personal reflections are evidenced, including those that are forward-thinking.

Grade B

Demonstrates: appropriate research skills resulting in a research question that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic; reasonably effective engagement with relevant research areas, methods and sources; good knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the relevant discipline; a reasonably effective application of source material and use of subject-specific terminology and/or concepts; consistent conclusions that are accurately analysed; reasoned argumentation often supported by evidence; research that at times evidences critical evaluation; a clear presentation of all structural and layout elements, which further supports the reading of the essay.

Engagement with the process is generally evidenced by the reflections and key decision-making during the research process is documented.

Grade C

Demonstrates: evidence of research undertaken, which has led to a research question that is not necessarily expressed in a way that can be explored within the scope of the chosen topic; partially effective engagement with mostly appropriate research areas, methods and sources—however, there are some discrepancies in those processes, although these do not interfere with the planning and approach; some knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the discipline, which is mostly relevant; the attempted application of source material and appropriate terminology and/or concepts; an attempted synthesis of research results with partially relevant analysis; conclusions partly supported by the evidence; discussion  that is descriptive rather than analytical; attempted evaluation; satisfactory presentation of the essay, with weaknesses that do not hinder the reading of the essay; some structural and layout elements that are missing or are incorrectly applied.

Engagement with the process is evidenced but shows mostly factual information, with personal reflection mostly limited to procedural issues.

Grade D

Demonstrates: a lack of research, resulting in unsatisfactory focus and a research question that is not answerable within the scope of the chosen topic; “at times engagement with appropriate research, methods and sources, but discrepancies in those processes that occasionally interfere with the planning and approach; some relevant knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the discipline, which are at times irrelevant; an attempted application of source material, but with inaccuracies in the use  of, or underuse of, terminology and/or concepts; irrelevant analysis and inconsistent conclusions as a result  of a descriptive discussion; a lack of evaluation; presentation of the essay that at times is illogical and hinders the reading; structural and layout elements that are missing.

Engagement with the process is evidenced but is superficial, with personal reflections that are solely narrative and concerned with procedural elements

Grade E

Demonstrates: an unclear nature of the essay; a generally unsystematic approach and resulting unfocused research question; limited engagement with limited research and sources; generally limited and only partially accurate knowledge and understanding of the topic in the wider context of the relevant discipline; ineffective connections in the application of source material and inaccuracies in the terminology and/or concepts used; a summarizing of results of research with inconsistent analysis; an attempted outline of an argument, but one that is generally descriptive in nature; a layout that generally lacks or incorrectly applies several layout and structural elements.

Engagement with the process is limited, with limited factual or decision-making information and no personal reflection on the process.

IBEE01

内容：Topic selection.

课程目的：Providing step-by-step guide for  Topic selection, general rules and  Writing standards，与学员进行第1次的选题，介绍所有题目的详细背景，了解学员的情况，介绍IA基本规则

输出结果：为下一步课程做前期准备

完成主体：学生与导师共同完成

IBEE02

内容：Conventional discussion

课程目的：Introduce students to the concept of EE essay Skills and explore which aspect shall be considered and what kind of background information shall be collected.介绍EE写作章法， 并与学生共同制定写作方向以及内容， 介绍该方向的背景资料

输出结果：形成初步稿件   

完成主体：学生与导师共同完成

IBEE03

内容：Mind Map

课程目的：Explore the concept of mind Map. begin to understand and draw the mind map for the EE.了解思维导图并为所选择的题目进行思维导图的构建，为EE做写作大纲的制定

输出结果：写作大纲制定   

完成主体：学生与导师共同完成

IBEE04

内容：Essay guide

课程目的：Help student to form the EE essay with logical diversity  帮助学生进行改稿与逻辑写作的辅导

输出结果：写作部分 Writing   

完成主体：学生与导师共同完成

IBEE05

内容：Proof Read

课程目的：Finalizing the last version of EE with grammatical correction 考纲要求规范文体，语法纠错

输出结果：定稿   

完成主体：导师完成

A加未来的课程辅导已经达到非常高的水平， A加未来顾问团队成员与课程导师对课程的考纲，测评重点与课程实时同步。在历年的考试中均有优异的成绩！

辅导老师拥有多年的辅导背景，有着丰富的教学经验。 辅导老师负责学生整体的课程以及专项提高。 

• 学生需要具备语言沟通能力

• 学生能够清晰的明确辅导方向

• 能够配合老师完成辅导目的

1. 学生不能选择同一时间段的两门或以上辅导内容否则会导致时间冲突。

2. 本辅导内容设有参与人数的下限、上限。人数达到上限后，该辅导则无法选择，参与人数未达到人数下限，则不能辅导。A加未来享有对此类留学辅导课的开设与否的解释权。

3. 设置、管理、评定等由A加留学服务委员会进行监督。辅导质量评估委员会由留学中心负责、总监、讲师组成，保障辅导环节的科学性及严谨性。

4. 学生签署A加未来留学或留学课程辅导合同，并遵守合同中所列事项

课程内容100%覆盖考纲，重点难点全方位解析

1、我们通过对近10年真题进行全面分析统计，总结出分值占比较大、失分率较高的考点，以此设计出30小时的课程安排。

2、突出重点，强化难点，以满足同学在较短时间可以有限度的查漏补缺的需求。

3、学生完成本课程后将对80%以上的考试内容，100%的考试重点、难点清晰、深层次的理解。

4、课程搭配的练习题80%以上采用历年考试的真题，完全切合真正考试的方向和难度，学生将在课程学习后，进一步熟悉考试大纲、掌握考试重点、难点知识内容。